4.6 Article

Observations of the First Electromagnetic Counterpart to a Gravitational-wave Source by the TOROS Collaboration

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
卷 848, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa9060

关键词

gamma-ray burst: individual (170817A); stars: neutron

资金

  1. NSF support through grant NSF-HRD [1242090]
  2. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas of Argentina
  3. FAPESP [2009/54202-8]
  4. Observatorio Nacional-MCT
  5. Southern Office of Aerospace Research and Development (SOARD), a branch of the Air Force Office of the Scientific Research International Office of the United States (AFOSR/IO) [FA9550-15-1-0167]
  6. Direccion de Investigacion y Desarrollo de la Universidad de La Serena through the Programa de Incentivo a la Investigacion Academica (PIA-DIULS)
  7. Brazilian agency CNPq [PDE-200289/2017-9, universal-459553/2014-3]
  8. Universidad of La Serena
  9. Argentine Gemini TAC
  10. Mexican GTC TAC
  11. Division Of Human Resource Development
  12. Direct For Education and Human Resources [1242090] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  13. Division Of Physics
  14. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1430152] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present the results of prompt optical follow-up of the electromagnetic counterpart of the gravitational-wave event GW170817 by the Transient Optical Robotic Observatory of the South Collaboration. We detected highly significant dimming in the light curves of the counterpart (Delta g= 0.17 +/- 0.03 mag, Delta r = 0.14 +/- 0.02 mag, Delta i = 0.10 +/- 0.03 mag) over the course of only 80 minutes of observations obtained similar to 35 hr after the trigger with the T80- South telescope. A second epoch of observations, obtained similar to 59 hr after the event with the EABA 1.5 m telescope, confirms the fast fading nature of the transient. The observed colors of the counterpart suggest that this event was a blue kilonova relatively free of lanthanides.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据