4.5 Article

Impact of 4 weeks of interval training on resting metabolic rate, fitness, and health-related outcomes

期刊

APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY NUTRITION AND METABOLISM
卷 42, 期 10, 页码 1073-1081

出版社

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1139/apnm-2017-0268

关键词

resting metabolic rate; respiratory quotient; interval training; substrate oxidation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Resting metabolic rate (RMR) and substrate oxidation (respiratory exchange ratio; RER) are important indicators of health. The effects of interval training on RMR have not been thoroughly investigated, which was the purpose of the present study. Thirty men and women (mean +/- SD age and maximal oxygen uptake: 28.8 +/- 7.6 years and 33.0 +/- 8.3 mL.kg(-1).min(-1)) completed 4 weeks of Wingate-based sprint interval training (SIT), repeated 1-min high-intensity intervals (HIIT), or served as controls. Before and after training, RMR, resting RER, maximal oxygen uptake, body composition, physical activity, and energy intake were recorded. Data were analyzed using a repeated-measures ANOVA. RMR increased in response to 4 weeks of SIT training (1789 +/- 293 to 1855 +/- 320 kcal.day(-1); p = 0.003) but did not increase after HIIT (1670 +/- 324 to 1704 +/- 329 kcal.day(-1); p = 0.06). While SIT increased RMR by similar to 2x the magnitude of HIIT, the difference was not significant (p = 0.5). Fasting substrate oxidation and RER did not change (p > 0.05). Maximal oxygen uptake increased, and small changes were also observed in percent body fat and fat mass (p < 0.05 for all). In conclusion, SIT provided a time-efficient stimulus to increase RMR after 4 weeks in healthy adults. However, the clinical relevance of the changes observed in this study remains to be determined. Further studies should be conducted in obese individuals and those with diabetes or insulin resistance to examine if interval training (>= 4 weeks) influences resting metabolic rate in magnitudes similar to that reported here.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据