4.2 Article

Weeds for weed control: Asteraceae essential oils as natural herbicides

期刊

WEED RESEARCH
卷 57, 期 5, 页码 342-353

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/wre.12266

关键词

weed control; allelopathy; bioassay; new crops

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to test the botanical family of Asteraceae as a source of natural herbicides. Twenty Asteraceae species were collected during flowering time and evaluated in terms of the yield and quality of essential oils (germination inhibition and growth of weeds). Half the species showed a sufficient yield of essential oil (from about 0.1% to 1.43%) when testing these phytochemicals invitro as germination inhibitors of two typical weeds, Amaranthus retroflexus and Setaria viridis. Despite the higher tolerance of S.viridis, the concentration of 100gL(-1) of essential oils of the two Artemisia species and Xanthium strumarium could totally inhibit germination. In addition, at 10gL (-1), the same essential oils showed full inhibition of A.retroflexus seeds. A comparison of their effectiveness at suboptimal doses led to a further selection of the most promising sources of essential oils. After their chemical characterisation, the essential oils were tested as post-emergence herbicides on seedlings of the above-cited weeds. After spraying the weeds at different concentrations (10, 100 and 1000mgL(-1)) during two different phenological stages of weed seedlings (cotyledons and the third true leaf), the essential oils of Artemisia annua and X.strumarium showed the best performance. The essential oils of X.strumarium were then tested again on both weeds to monitor the dynamics of plant injury. A reduction in plant fresh weight (about 20%-30% after 10days) and chlorophyll content (destroyed, after the same amount of time) was found, thus confirming the total and rapid effectiveness of these essential oils. In summary, A.annua and X.strumarium have elicited considerable agronomic interest and appear to be suitable as a source of essential oils to act as natural herbicides.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据