4.6 Review

Pulsed-field gradient nuclear magnetic resonance measurements (PFG NMR) for diffusion ordered spectroscopy (DOSY) mapping

期刊

ANALYST
卷 142, 期 20, 页码 3771-3796

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7an01031a

关键词

-

资金

  1. French National Agency for the Safety of Medicines and Health Products (Agence Nationale de Securite du Medicament et des Produits de Sante
  2. ANSM) [AAP-2012-082, 2012S071]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

While NMR is the most used analytical method for determining the molecular structure of isolated chemical entities, small compounds as well as macromolecules, its capability of analysing complex mixtures is less known. The advent of Diffusion Ordered SpectroscopY (DOSY) NMR has made diffusion experiments popular, enabling diffusion coefficients to be routinely measured and used to characterize chemical systems in solution. Indeed, since the translational diffusion coefficients of molecular species reflect their effective sizes and shapes, DOSY NMR allows the separation of the chemical entities present in multicomponent systems and, as in all diffusion NMR experiments, provides information on their intermolecular interactions as well as on their size and shape. Themain aimof this review is to present an overview of the DOSY NMR mapping and its applications. The paper starts with a brief introduction to pulsed-field gradient (PFG) NMR and then focuses on the methodological procedures that can be used to perform good diffusion data acquisition and to obtain good-quality DOSY maps. The second part describes, through selected literature examples, different applications of DOSY NMR to demonstrate the potential of the method for (i) unravelling the components of complex matrices comprising pharmaceuticals, dietary supplements, foods and beverages, and biological extracts, and (ii) probing intermolecular interactions and evaluating association constants between different hosts and guests, as well as estimating the sizes and molecular weights of molecular species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据