4.7 Article

Aqueous chemistry of Ce(IV): estimations using actinide analogues

期刊

DALTON TRANSACTIONS
卷 46, 期 39, 页码 13553-13561

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7dt02251d

关键词

-

资金

  1. Agence Nationale de la Recherche through the LABEX CaPPA [ANR-11-LABX-0005-01]
  2. Ministry of Higher Education and Research
  3. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) through the Contrat de Projets Etat-Region (CPER CLIMIBIO)
  4. Hauts de France council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The prediction of cerium (Ce) aqueous speciation is relevant in many research fields. Indeed, Ce compounds are used for many industrial applications, which may require the control of Ce aqueous chemistry for their synthesis. The aquatic geochemistry of Ce is also of interest. Due to its growing industrial use and its release into the environment, Ce is now considered as an emerging contaminant. Cerium is also used as a proxy of (paleo) redox conditions due to the Ce(IV)/Ce(III) redox transition. Finally, Ce(IV) is often presented as a relevant analogue of tetravalent actinides (An(IV)). In the present study, quantum chemical calculations were conducted to highlight the similarities between the structures of Ce(IV) and tetravalent actinide (An(IV); An = Th, Pa, U, Np, Pu) aqua-ions, especially Pu(IV). The current knowledge of An(IV) hydrolysis, solubility and colloid formation in water was briefly reviewed but important discrepancies were observed in the available data for Ce(IV). Therefore, new estimations of the hydrolysis constants of Ce(IV) and the solubility of Ce(IV)-(hydr) oxides are proposed, by analogy with Pu(IV). By plotting pH-Eh (Pourbaix) diagrams, we showed that the pH values corresponding to the onset of Ce(IV) species formation (i.e. Ce(IV)-(hydr) oxide or dissolved Ce(IV)) agreed with various experimental results. Although further experimental studies are required to obtain a more accurate thermodynamic database, the present work might yet help to predict more accurately the Ce chemical behavior in aqueous solution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据