4.8 Article

Assessment of Novel Long-Lasting Ceria-Stabilized Zirconia-Based Ceramics with Different Surface Topographies as Implant Materials

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 27, 期 40, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201702512

关键词

bacterial adhesion; human osteoblasts; implant materials; osseointegration; zirconia-based composites

资金

  1. European Community's Seventh Framework Programme [280741]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of long-lasting zirconia-based ceramics for implants, which are not prone to hydrothermal aging, is not satisfactorily solved. Therefore, this study is conceived as an overall evaluation screening of novel ceria-stabilized zirconia-alumina-aluminate composite ceramics (ZA(8)Sr(8)-Ce11) with different surface topographies for use in clinical applications. Ceria-stabilized zirconia is chosen as the matrix for the composite material, due to its lower susceptibility to aging than yttria-stabilized zirconia (3Y-TZP). This assessment is carried out on three preclinical investigation levels, indicating an overall biocompatibility of ceria-stabilized zirconia-based ceramics, both in vitro and in vivo. Long-term attachment and mineralized extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition of primary osteoblasts are the most distinct on porous ZA(8)Sr(8)-Ce11(p) surfaces, while ECM attachment on 3Y-TZP and ZA(8)Sr(8)-Ce11 with compact surface texture is poor. In this regard, the animal study confirms the porous ZA(8)Sr(8)-Ce11(p) to be the most favorable material, showing the highest bone-to-implant contact values and implant stability post implantation in comparison with control groups. Moreover, the microbiological evaluation reveals no favoritism of biofilm formation on the porous ZA(8)Sr(8)-Ce11(p) when compared to a smooth control surface. Hence, together with the in vitro in vivo assessment analogy, the promising clinical potential of this novel ZA(8)Sr(8)-Ce11 as an implant material is demonstrated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据