4.7 Article

Enhanced low-temperature NH3-SCR performance of MnOx/CeO2 catalysts by optimal solvent effect

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 420, 期 -, 页码 407-415

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.05.156

关键词

MnOx/CeO2 catalysts; Solvent effect; Low-temperature NH3-SCR; Dispersion; Electron interaction

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21507130]
  2. Chongqing Science & Technology Commission [cstc2016jcyjA0070, cstc2014pt-gc20002, cstc2014yykfC20003, cstckjcxljrc13]
  3. Chongqing Key Laboratory of Catalysis and Functional Organic Molecules from Chongqing Technology and Business University [1456029]
  4. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Vehicle Emissions Control [OVEC001, OVEC007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of MnOx/CeO2 catalysts were prepared by modulating the solvents (deionized water (DW), anhydrous ethanol (AE), acetic acid (AA), and oxalic acid (OA) solution) with the purpose of improving the low-temperature NH3-SCR performance, broadening the operating temperature window, and enhancing the H2O + SO2 resistance. The synthesized catalysts were characterized by means of N-2-physisorption, XRD, EDS mapping, Raman, XPS, H-2-TPR, NH3-TPD, and in situ DRIFTS technologies. Furthermore, the catalytic performance and H2O + SO2 resistance were evaluated by NH3-SCR model reaction. The obtained results indicate that MnOx/CeO2 catalyst prepared with oxalic acid solution as a solvent exhibits the best catalytic performance among these catalysts, which shows above 80% NO conversion during a wide operating temperature range of 100-250 degrees C and good H2O + SO2 resistance for low-temperature NH3-SCR reaction. This is related to that oxalic acid solution can promote the dispersion of MnOx and enhance the electron interaction between MnOx and CeO2, which are beneficial to improving the physicochemical property of MnOx/CeO2 catalyst, and further lead to the enhancement of catalytic performance and good H2O + SO2 resistance. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据