3.9 Review

Nanoparticles for Advanced Photodynamic Therapy of Cancer

期刊

PHOTOMEDICINE AND LASER SURGERY
卷 35, 期 11, 页码 581-588

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/pho.2017.4308

关键词

cancer; nanotechnology; therapy; nanomaterials; nanoparticles; photodynamic therapy

类别

资金

  1. National Nanoscience Postgraduate Teaching and Training Platform (NNPTT)
  2. University of Johannesburg
  3. National Laser
  4. South African Research Chairs Initiative of the Department of Science and Technology
  5. National Research Foundation of South Africa [98337]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The world widespread rise in cancer incidence has caused an increase in the demand for effective and safe materials for treatment. One of the most prevalent forms of treatment for cancer is photodynamic therapy (PDT), which is seen as an alternative to radiotherapy, as well as chemotherapy. In more recent years, researchers are exploring new nanotechnology-based strategies to improve the effectiveness of PDT. Objective: The objective of this review is to explore the current trends and research findings associated with PDT and the development of nanotechnology as treatment modality for cancer. Nanotechnology commonly deals with nanomaterials, which are well defined by their reduced size (which is <100nm), allowing these small nanostructured particles to have unique physical, chemical, and biological properties. The unique properties of nanomaterials attribute them to have enormous potential application in many interdisciplinary fields such as medicine, electronics, biomaterials, and so on. This mini-review presents a collection of important works published with focus of nanotechnology and cancer treatment by PDT. Conclusions: Despite significant efforts to develop nanosystems for efficient PDT cancer treatment, it remains a challenge to develop nanostructured drug delivery systems that combine targeted tumor recognition with effective production of reactive singlet oxygen under PDT irradiation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据