4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Use of pillared clays in the preparation of washcoated clay honeycomb monoliths as support of manganese catalysts for the total oxidation of VOCs

期刊

CATALYSIS TODAY
卷 296, 期 -, 页码 84-94

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2017.04.025

关键词

Environmental catalysis; Honeycomb monoliths; Manganese; Pillared clays; VOCs oxidation

资金

  1. Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness of Spain (Project MINECO/FEDER) [MAT2013-40823-R]
  2. Junta de Andalucia [FQM-110, FQM-334]
  3. Comision Sectorial de Investigacion Cientifica (CSIC-Udelar)
  4. PEDECIBA-Quimica (Uruguay)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Manganese catalysts supported by impregnation onto honeycomb monoliths extruded from commercial clay, previously coated with aluminium-pillared clay, were prepared and tested in the total combustion of propane and acetone. Samples characterization included chemical analysis, nitrogen physisorption, electron microscopies (SEM-EDS, HAADF and EELS), XRD, TPR and O-2-TPD experiments. The active phase (around 5 wt%), consisting of MnO2 particles as majority phase, with homogeneous size and shape, that tends to concentrate in some regions of the surface of the clay support, exhibited high efficiency to oxidize the two model VOCs investigated and stability in severe reaction conditions. Light-off temperatures as low as 225 and 330 degrees C were found for the oxidation of acetone and propane respectively. The better performance observed in comparison to the monoliths without pillared clay was attributed to the higher active phase loading. Differences found as function of the VOC's nature and concentration were related to the different oxidation mechanisms proposed in literature, either just Mars-van Krevelen or this with also Eley-Rideal contribution, for acetone and propane respectively. These results combined with the intrinsic advantages of the honeycomb monolithic design open up new possibilities for using pillared clays as catalytic support in VOCs oxidation under more affordable conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据