4.7 Article

Fatty Acid Metabolic Remodeling During Type 2 Diabetes Remission After Bariatric Surgery

期刊

DIABETES
卷 66, 期 11, 页码 2743-2755

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/db17-0414

关键词

-

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) (Institute of Nutrition, Metabolism and Diabetes) [MOP97947]
  2. Canadian Diabetes Association [OG-3-14-4507-AC]
  3. CIHR
  4. Fonds de recherche du Quebec - Sante/Ministere de la sante et des services sociaux (FRQS/MSSS)
  5. Canadian Diabetes Association
  6. Endocrine Fellow Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hypertrophic remodeling of white adipose tissues is associated with overexposure of lean organs to circulating triglycerides (TGs) and nonesterified fatty acids (NEFAs), ultimately leading to insulin resistance. Bariatric surgery promotes type 2 diabetes (T2D) remission through a succession of weight loss-dependent and -independent mechanisms. However, the longitudinal contribution of adipocyte size reduction and fatty acid metabolic handling remain unknown. Here we show that severely obese participants with T2D display hypertriglyceridemia and excessive systemic lipolysis during intravenous lipid overload. Three days after biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (DS), whole-body glycerol turnover was normalized and associated with lower HOMA-insulin resistance index. A mean excess weight loss of 84% was achieved 12 months after DS. The smaller subcutaneous adipocyte size predicted better glycemic control in T2D. TG disposal and acylcarnitine production during lipid overload, along with muscle insulin sensitivity, improved with weight loss. Nevertheless, systemic NEFA fluxes and NEFA spillover remained similar, suggesting that increased NEFA storage capacity per volume of adipose tissue exactly compensated for the decrease in fat mass during weight loss. In conclusion, T2D remission after DS is mainly associated with greater circulating TG disposal, lower systemic lipolysis, and better fatty acid handling by lean tissues.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据