4.1 Article

Suicide stigma' renegotiated: Storytelling, social support and resistance in an Internet-based community for the young suicide-bereaved

期刊

QUALITATIVE SOCIAL WORK
卷 16, 期 6, 页码 775-792

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1473325016644039

关键词

Social work practice; bereavement; narrative; stigma; suicide; Internet

向作者/读者索取更多资源

From a social constructionist and narrative perspective on grief, which emphasizes the connection between situated storytelling, meaning-making and self-formation, this article explores the power of collective storytelling in an Internet-based community of the suicide-bereaved. This is a context where young mourners who have lost a parent to suicide, among others, turn for social support, which is another main focus of the article. Using Scott and Lyman's taxonomy of accounting practices' to explain unanticipated' or untoward behavior', the approaches to meaning-making of suicide applied in this context for support exchange are analyzed, in the accounts of the parentally bereaved participants and in a co-produced bereavement story. The results showcase how the narrative framing for the interpretation and organization of the suicide experience provided by the website editors as a resistance to the suicide stigma', together with the power of the experience accumulated by many, can potentially work to destigmatize and empower the parentally bereaved participants' grief. In addition, this public storytelling is acting to spread lived knowledge' and thereby to counteract suicide stigma in society. Ultimately, the results constitute a call for a return to a narrative orientation in social work practice. By adopting a teller-focused approach as part of assessment and treatment, social workers could inspire the often traumatized and stigmatized individuals they encounter to become narrators of their own life- and self-narratives, and to assist in the construction of a more tolerable meaning and identity from their experiences.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据