4.7 Article

First-principles/Phase-field modeling of ∼\' precipitation in Al-Cu alloys

期刊

ACTA MATERIALIA
卷 140, 期 -, 页码 344-354

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.08.046

关键词

First-principles calculation; Phase-field modeling; Al-Cu; theta' precipitates; Equilibrium aspect ratio

资金

  1. US Department of Energy [DE-EE0006082]
  2. Northwestern University Information Technology (NUIT)
  3. Office for Research
  4. Office of the Provost

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We examine the equilibrium morphology of Al2Cu (theta') precipitates in Al-Cu alloys using a phase field method with the parameters supplied by first-principles density functional theory (DFT) calculations. The phase field method employed allows for an interfacial energy that is highly anisotropic: there are missing high-energy orientations and corners on the Wulff shape. This high degree of anisotropic interfacial energy yields a plate-shaped equilibrium theta' precipitate in two-dimensions and a disk-like shape in three dimensions. Also, we consider the effects of a mismatch in elastic-moduli (elastic in homogeneity) of Al and theta' elastic anisotropy, as well as tetragonal misfit strain anisotropy to gain a fuller picture of the elastic energy contributions to the morphology of theta' precipitates. Based on our phase-field modeling, the results show that the aspect ratio of the precipitate morphology with the anisotropy of interfacial and strain energies as given by DFT is significantly smaller than the aspect ratio observed in the experiment after long aging times (similar to 50 h). Specifically, the computed length (54 nm) is almost ten-times smaller than the length (similar to 580 nm) observed in the Al-Cu experiment with similar precipitate thickness (similar to 10 nm). Thus, we conclude that the experimental morphology after long aging times (similar to 50 h) is strongly influenced by the kinetics of precipitate growth. (C) 2017 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据