4.6 Article

Parametric sensitivity study on regional seismic damage prediction of reinforced masonry buildings based on time-history analysis

期刊

BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING
卷 15, 期 11, 页码 4791-4820

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-017-0168-9

关键词

Masonry structure; Sensitivity analysis; Parameter uncertainty; Regional seismic damage prediction; Multiple-degree-of-freedom shear model; Time-history analysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51578320, 51378299]
  2. National Key Technology RD Program [2015BAK14B02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Regional seismic damage prediction is an important approach to discover the weakness of a city so as to effectively mitigate seismic losses. A major proportion of regional seismic losses is caused by masonry buildings. As a result, an accurate prediction of the regional seismic damage to masonry buildings has significant engineering and scientific values. Various parameters of the computational models for regional seismic damage predictions usually involve considerable uncertainty, especially for masonry buildings. Therefore, a parametric sensitivity analysis for the regional seismic damage prediction of reinforced masonry buildings is performed in some detail in this study. Damage to this kind of buildings is predicted through nonlinear time-history analysis using the multiple-degree-of-freedom shear model, which can better represent the features of different buildings and ground motions. In the sensitivity analysis, two widely used methods, the first-order second-moment (FOSM) method and the Monte Carlo method, are adopted and their prediction results are compared. The outcomes of this study indicate that the uncertainty of parameters has a small influence on the analysis results when the total number of regional buildings is large. However the uncertainty cannot be neglected for individual building analysis. In addition, the FOSM method, which is more time-saving, can achieve a similar level of prediction as the Monte Carlo simulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据