4.7 Article

Stochastic estimation of hydraulic transmissivity fields using flow connectivity indicator data

期刊

WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH
卷 53, 期 1, 页码 602-618

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2015WR018507

关键词

flow connectivity indicator; Cooper-Jacob method; transmissivity; parameter estimation; anisotropy; cokriging

资金

  1. ENRESA (Empresa Nacional de Residuos, S.A.)
  2. ICREA Academia Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most methods for hydraulic test interpretation rely on a number of simplified assumptions regarding the homogeneity and isotropy of the underlying porous media. This way, the actual heterogeneity of any natural parameter, such as transmissivity ( T), is transferred to the corresponding estimates in a way heavily dependent on the interpretation method used. An example is a long-term pumping test interpreted by means of the Cooper-Jacob method, which implicitly assumes a homogeneous isotropic confined aquifer. The estimates obtained from this method are not local values, but still have a clear physical meaning; the estimated T represents a regional-scale effective value, while the log-ratio of the normalized estimated storage coefficient, indicated by , is an indicator of flow connectivity, representative of the scale given by the distance between the pumping and the observation wells. In this work we propose a methodology to use , together with sampled local measurements of transmissivity at selected points, to map the expected value of local T values using a technique based on cokriging. Since the interpolation involves two variables measured at different support scales, a critical point is the estimation of the covariance and crosscovariance matrices. The method is applied to a synthetic field displaying statistical anisotropy, showing that the inclusion of connectivity indicators in the estimation method provide maps that effectively display preferential flow pathways, with direct consequences in solute transport.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据