4.4 Article

Sex differences in heart rate variability: a longitudinal study in international elite cross-country skiers

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 115, 期 10, 页码 2107-2114

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-015-3190-0

关键词

Autonomic nervous system; Heart rate variability; Orthostatic test; Athletes; Endurance; Training

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Exercise-related sudden cardiac deaths (SCD) occur with a striking male predominance. A higher sympathetic tone in men has been suggested as risk factor for SCD. Elite athletes have the highest risk for exercise-related SCD. We aimed to analyze the autonomic nervous system of elite cross-country skiers from Norway, Russia and Switzerland in supine position and after orthostatic challenge in various training periods (TP). Measurements of heart rate variability (HRV) were performed on a weekly basis over 1 year using an orthostatic challenge test with controlled breathing. Main outcome parameters were the high-frequency power in supine position (HFsupine) as marker of cardiac parasympathetic activity and the low-frequency/high-frequency power ratio after orthostatic challenge (LF/HFstand) as marker of cardiac sympathetic activation. Training intensity and duration were recorded daily and expressed as training strain. The training year was divided into three TPs. An average of weekly HRV measurements was calculated for each TP. Female (n = 19, VO2max 62.0 +/- A 4.6 ml kg(-1) min(-1), age 25.8 +/- A 4.3 years) and male (n = 16, VO2max 74.3 +/- A 6.3 ml kg(-1) min(-1), age 24.4 +/- A 4.2 years) athletes were included. Training strain was comparable between sexes (all p > 0.05) and changed between TPs (all p < 0.05) while no HRV parameters changed over time. There were no sex differences in HFsupine while the LF/HFstand was significantly higher in male athletes in all TPs. For a comparable amount of training, male athletes showed constantly higher markers of sympathetic activity after a provocation maneuver. This may explain part of the male predominance in sports-related SCD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据