4.7 Article

Reexamining the mechanical property space of three-dimensional lattice architectures

期刊

ACTA MATERIALIA
卷 140, 期 -, 页码 424-432

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.08.052

关键词

Nanolattices; Nanoarchitected materials; Lattices; Cellular solids; Mechanics

资金

  1. DARPA's MCMA program [W91CRB-10-0305]
  2. Amgen through A.M.'s graduate fellowship [12520032]
  3. DoD through the Vannevar-Bush Fellowship
  4. Office of Naval Research [N00014-16-1-2431]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lightweight materials that are simultaneously strong and stiff are desirable for a range of applications from transportation to energy storage to defense. Micro- and nanolattices represent some of the lightest fabricated materials to date, but studies of their mechanical properties have produced inconsistent re sults that are not well captured by existing lattice models. We performed systematic nanomechanical experiments on four distinct geometries of solid polymer and hollow ceramic (AI(2)O(3)) nanolattices. All samples tested had a nearly identical scaling of strength (sigma(y)) and Young's modulus (E) with relative density ((rho)over-bar), ranging from (sigma(y)) infinity(rho)over-bar(145) top (rho)over-bar(1.92) and E infinity (rho)over-bar(1.41) to (rho)over-bar (1.83), revealing that changing topology alone does not necessarily have a significant impact on nanolattice mechanical properties. Finite element analysis was performed on solid and hollow lattices with structural parameters beyond those realized experimentally, enabling the identification of transition regimes where solid-beam lattices diverge from existing analytical theories and revealing the complex parameter space of hollow-beam lattices. We propose a simplified analytical model for solid-beam lattices that provides insight into the mechanisms behind their observed stiffness, and we investigate different hollow-beam lattice parameters that give rise to their aberrant properties. These experimental, computational and theoretical results uncover how architecture can be used to access unique lattice mechanical property spaces while demonstrating the practical limits of existing beam-based models in characterizing their behavior. (C) 2017 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据