4.7 Article

A New Generation of Tropical Cyclone Size Measurements from Space

期刊

BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY
卷 98, 期 11, 页码 2367-2386

出版社

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00291.1

关键词

-

资金

  1. Met Office under the European Space Agency SMOS + STORM Evolution [4000105171/12/I-BG]
  2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  3. Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation [RFMEFI58615X0017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Wind radii estimates in tropical cyclones (TCs) are crucial to helping determine the TC wind structure for the production of effective warnings and to constrain initial conditions for a number of applications. In that context, we report on the capabilities of a new generation of satellite microwave radiometers operating at L-band frequency (approximate to 1.4 GHz) and dual C band (approximate to 6.9 and 7.3 GHz). These radiometers provide wide-swath (>1,000 km) coverage at a spatial resolution of approximate to 40 km and revisit of approximate to 3 days. The L-band measurements are almost unaffected by rain and atmospheric effects, while dual C-band data offer an efficient way to significantly minimize these impacts. During storm conditions, increasing foam coverage and thickness at the ocean surface sufficiently modify the surface emissivity at these frequencies and, in turn, the brightness temperature (Tb) measurements. Based on aircraft measurements, new geophysical model functions have been derived to infer reliable ocean surface wind speeds from measured Tb variations. Data from these sensors collected over 2010-15 are shown to provide reliable estimates of the gale-force (34 kt), damaging (50 kt), and destructive winds (64 kt) within the best track wind radii uncertainty. Combined, and further associated with other available observations, these measurements can now provide regular quantitative and complementary surface wind information of interest for operational TC forecasting operations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据