4.7 Article

Quantifying the Human Induced Water Level Decline of China's Largest Freshwater Lake from the Changing Underlying Surface in the Lake Region

期刊

WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT
卷 32, 期 4, 页码 1467-1482

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11269-017-1881-5

关键词

Water resources; Water level; Sand mining; BPNN model; Poyang Lake

资金

  1. Key Laboratory of Watershed Geographic Sciences, Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences [WSGS2015003]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41571023, 41561134016]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province [20161BAB203103]
  4. key grant of Chinese Academy of Sciences [KZZD-EW-12]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In recent years, dramatic decline in China's largest freshwater lake, Poyang Lake, has raised wide concerns about water supply and ecological crises in the middle-lower Yangtze River reaches. To assist in resolving the debates regarding the low water regime of the lake, the current study quantitatively assessed the enhanced water level decline from the changing underlying surface in the Poyang Lake region. It is the first time that the magnitude, temporal-spatial difference, trend development and background mechanism of lake water level variation and its causes are studied comprehensively. The results revealed that the changing underlying surface in the lake region has caused an average decline of annual water level of 0.26 m similar to 0.75 m across the lake during 2000-2014, which shows great seasonal and spatial differences. The enlarged outflow cross-section due to extensive sand mining was the major reason for the effect on water level decline in the northern lake. While, increased water surface gradient should be attributed to water level decline in the southern lake. The long-term increasing trend of annual lake water level decline reflects the cumulative effects of lake bottom topography change caused by the continuous south movement of sand mining activities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据