4.4 Article

Evaluation of a New Fully Automated Assay for Plasma Intact FGF23

期刊

CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL
卷 101, 期 5, 页码 510-518

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00223-017-0307-y

关键词

FGF23; Reference values; Vitamin D; Chronic kidney disease; Hypophosphatemia; Hyperphosphatemia

资金

  1. DiaSorin
  2. Roche Diagnostics
  3. Abbott
  4. Amgen
  5. Shire
  6. MSD
  7. Lilly
  8. Rottapharm
  9. IDS
  10. Roche
  11. Fresenius
  12. Menarini
  13. Sanofi

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Several FGF23 immunoassays are available. However, they are reserved for research purposes as none have been approved for clinical use. We evaluated the performances of a new automated assay for intact FGF23 on the DiaSorin Liaison platform which is approved for clinical use. We established reference values in 908 healthy French subjects aged 18-89 years, and measured iFGF23 in patients with disorders of phosphate metabolism and in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Intra-assay CV was 1.04-2.86% and inter-assay CV was 4.01-6.3%. The limit of quantification was < 10 ng/L. Serum iFGF23 concentrations were considerably lower than EDTA values highlighting the importance of using exclusively EDTA plasma. Liaison iFGF23 values were approximately 25% higher than Immutopics values. In the 908 healthy subjects, distribution of the Liaison iFGF23 values was Gaussian with a mean +/- 2SD interval of 22.7-93.1 ng/L. Men had a slightly higher level than women (60.3 +/- 17.6 and 55.2 +/- 17.2 ng/L, respectively). Plasma iFGF23 concentration in 11 patients with tumour-induced osteomalacia, 8 patients with X-linked hypophosphatemic rickets, 43 stage 3a, 43 stage 3b, 43 stage 4, 44 stage 5 CKD patients, and 44 dialysis patients were 217.2 +/- 144.0, 150.9 +/- 28.6, 98.5 +/- 42.0, 130.8 +/- 88.6, 130.8 +/- 88.6, 331.7 +/- 468.2, 788.8 +/- 1306.6 and 6103.9 +/- 11,178.8 ng/L, respectively. This new iFGF23 assay available on a platform that already allows the measurement of other important parameters of the mineral metabolism is a real improvement for the laboratories and clinicians/researchers involved in this field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据