4.2 Article

Assessment of Runoff, Water and Sediment Quality in the Selenga River Basin Aided by a Web-Based Geoservice

期刊

WATER RESOURCES
卷 44, 期 3, 页码 399-416

出版社

MAIK NAUKA/INTERPERIODICA/SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1134/S0097807817030113

关键词

Selenga river system; Lake Baikal; water quality assessment; transboundary rivers; geodatabase

资金

  1. International Bureau of the German Federal Ministry for Education and Research [01DJ13013, 01DJ14013]
  2. Russian Geographical Society
  3. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research
  4. German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) scholarship [A/12/97034]
  5. Project Management Agency Julich [033L003]
  6. Russian Scientific Foundation [14-17-00155]
  7. Russian Science Foundation [17-17-00013] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Selenga River is the main artery feeding Lake Baikal. It has a catchment of similar to 450000 km(2) in the boundary region between Northern Mongolia and Southern Siberia. Climate, land use and dynamic socioeconomic changes go along with rising water abstractions and contaminant loads originating from mining sites and urban wastewater. In the future, these pressures might have negative impacts on the ecosystems of Lake Baikal and the Selenga River Delta, which is an important wetland region in itself and forms the last geobiochemical barrier before the Selenga drains into Lake Baikal. The following study aims to assess current trends in hydrology and water quality in the Selenga-Baikal basin, identify their drivers and to set up models (WaterGAP3 framework and ECOMAG) for the prediction of future changes. Of particular relevance for hydrological and water quality changes in the recent past were climate and land use trends as well as contaminant influx from mining areas and urban settlements. In the near future, additional hydrological modifications due to the construction of dams and abstractions/water diversions from the Selenga's Mongolian tributaries could lead to additional alterations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据