4.8 Article

Hydrolysis of particulate settleable solids (PSS) in activated sludge is determined by the bacteria initially adsorbed in the sewage

期刊

WATER RESEARCH
卷 125, 期 -, 页码 400-409

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.08.058

关键词

Wastewater; Hydrolysis; Particulate settleable solids; Activated sludge; Respirometry; Inoculum

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Up to half of the organic fraction of an urban wastewater is made up of particulate settleable solids (PSS). In activated sludge process (AS) this material is rapidly adsorbed on to microbial flocs but is only slowly and partially degraded. To better understand and predict the degradation kinetics observed, a determination of the proportion of hydrolytic bacteria is required. As inoculum is usually added in the biodegradation tests, a comparison is required between the roles of bacteria introduced with the inoculum and those attached to the substrate. In this work, respirometric batch experiments were performed on PSS collected from upstream or downstream of the sewers of Toulouse city. Toilet paper (TP) and cellulose, two model particulate substrates, were also investigated. To understand the role of the active biomass in hydrolysis, increasing concentrations of AS were added to a certain amount of PSS or TP. No correlation was observed between the concentration of AS and the rate and duration of degradation of the particulate matter. Simulations performed after calibration of the model ASM-1 allowed the fraction of hydrolytic bacteria to be estimated in both the substrate and the AS-inoculum. Only a very small fraction of the bacteria of AS and of the substrate samples were found to be efficient for hydrolysis. Hydrolysis was mainly initiated by a small proportion of the microorganisms, and especially by cells already attached to PSSs. Moreover, the fraction of bacteria able to hydrolyse large particles present in an inoculum of AS depended on the initial contamination of the surface of the particles. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据