4.8 Article

Highly selective transformation of ammonia nitrogen to N2 based on a novel solar-driven photoelectrocatalytic-chlorine radical reactions system

期刊

WATER RESEARCH
卷 125, 期 -, 页码 512-519

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.08.053

关键词

Photoelectrocatalytic-chlorine radical reactions; Chlorine; Radical-mediated reactions; WO3 nanoplate array; Ammonia nitrogen degradation

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [21776177, 51578332, 21576162]
  2. Shanghai Yangfan Program [14YF1401500]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A highly selective method for transforming ammonia nitrogen to N-2 was proposed, based on a novel solar-driven photoelectrocatalytic-chlorine radical reactions (PEC-chlorine) system. The PEC-chlorine system was facilitated by a visible light response WO3 nanoplate array (NPA) electrode in an ammonia solution containing chloride ions (Cl-). Under illumination, photoholes from WO3 promote the oxidation of to chlorine radical (Cl-center dot). This radical can selectively transform ammonia nitrogen to N-2 (79.9%) and NO3- (19.2%), similar to the breakpoint chlorination reaction. The ammonia nitrogen removal efficiency increased from 10.6% (PEC without Cl-) to 99.9% with the PEC-chlorine system within 90 min operation, which can be attributed to the cyclic reactions between Cl-/Cl-center dot and the reaction intermediates (NH2 center dot, center dot NHCl, etc.) that expand the degradation reactions from the surface of the electrodes to the whole solution system. Moreover, Cl-center dot is the main radical species contributing to the transformation of ammonia nitrogen to N2, which is confirmed by the tBuOH capture experiment. Compared to conventional breakpoint chlorination, the PEC-chlorine system is a more economical and efficient means for ammonia nitrogen degradation because of the fast removal rate, no additional chlorine cost, and its use of clean energy (since it is solar-driven). (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据