4.8 Article

A novel fuzzy-logic control strategy minimizing N2O emissions

期刊

WATER RESEARCH
卷 123, 期 -, 页码 479-494

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.06.074

关键词

Nitrous oxide; Fuzzy-logic; Wastewater; Control; Nitrogen

资金

  1. Innovation Fund Denmark (IFD) (Project LaGAS) [0603-00523B]
  2. Veolia Water Technologies (Kruger, AnoxKaldnes, The Veolia Group)
  3. wastewater utilities (Biofos, DK)
  4. wastewater utilities (VA SYD, SE)
  5. wastewater utilities (Lyngby-Taarbaek forsyning, DX)
  6. wastewater utilities (FORS A/S, DX)
  7. wastewater utilities (Vaxjo, SE)
  8. Unisense Environment, DX
  9. Fluxsense AB, SE

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel control strategy for achieving low N2O emissions and low effluent NH4+ concentration is here proposed. The control strategy uses the measurements of ammonium and nitrate concentrations in inlet and outlet of the aerobic zone of a wastewater treatment plant to calculate a ratio indicating the balance among the microbial groups. More specifically, the ratio will indicate if there is a complete nitrification. In case nitrification is not complete, the controller will adjust the aeration level of the plant in order to inhibit the production of N2O from AOB and HB denitrification. The controller was implemented using the fuzzy logic approach. It was comprehensively tested for different model structures and different sets of model parameters with regards to its ability of mitigating N2O emissions for future applications in real wastewater treatment plants. It is concluded that the control strategy is useful for those plants having AOB denitrification as the main N2O producing process. However, in treatment plants having incomplete NH2OH oxidation as the main N2O producing pathway, a cascade controller configuration adapting the oxygen supply to respect only the effluent ammonium concentration limits was found to be more effective to ensure low N2O emissions. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据