4.8 Article

Evaluation of key parameters on simultaneous sulfate reduction and sulfide oxidation in an autotrophic biocathode

期刊

WATER RESEARCH
卷 123, 期 -, 页码 301-310

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.06.050

关键词

Bioelectrochemical system (BES); Cathode potential; Ionic exchange membrane (IEM); pH; Sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB); Sulfide-oxidizing bacteria (SOB)

资金

  1. Spanish Government with a grant Explora Ciencia y Explora Tecnologia [CTM2014-62179-EXP]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bioelectrochemical systems (BESs) are being studied as an alternative technology for the treatment of several kinds of wastewaters with a lack of electron donor such as high-strength sulfate wastewaters. This study evaluates different parameters that influence the simultaneous sulfate reduction and sulfide oxidation in an autotrophic biocathode: ion-exchange membrane (IEM), cathodic pH and cathode potential. Two different membranes were studied to evaluate sulfate and sulfide adsorption and diffusion from the cathode to the anode, observing that a cation-exchange membrane (CEM) widely decreased these effects. Three different cathode Of (5.5, 7 and 8.5) were studied in a long-term operation observing that pH = 7 was the optimal for sulfate removal, achieving reduction rates around 150 mg S-SO42- L-1 d(-1). Microbial community analysis of the cathode biofilm demonstrated a high abundance of sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB, 67% at pH 7, 60% at pH 8.5 and 42% at pH 5.5), mainly Desulfovibrio sp. at pH 5.5 and 7 and Desulfonatronum sp. at pH 8.5. The cathode potential also was studied from -0.7 to -1.2 V vs. SHE achieving sulfate removal rates higher than 700 mg S-SO42- L-1 d(-1) at cathode potentials from -1.0 to -1.2 V vs. SHE. Also, the highest cathodic recovery and the highest sulfur species imbalance were observed at a cathode potential of -1.0 V vs. SHE, which indicated a higher elemental sulfur production. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据