4.8 Review

Resilience theory incorporated into urban wastewater systems management. State of the art

期刊

WATER RESEARCH
卷 115, 期 -, 页码 149-161

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.02.047

关键词

Management; Resilience; Sewer systems; Wastewater; WRRF

资金

  1. European Union [642904]
  2. Ministry of Economy and competitiveness [RYC-2013-14595]
  3. MINECO/FEDER, EU [CTM2015-66892-R]
  4. UK Engineering & Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K006924/1]
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K006924/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [642904] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)
  7. EPSRC [EP/K006924/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Government bodies, utilities, practitioners, and researchers have growing interest in the incorporation of resilience into wastewater management. Since resilience is a multidisciplinary term, it is important to review what has been achieved in the wastewater sector, and describe the future research directions for the forthcoming years. This work presents a critical review of studies that deal with resilience in the wastewater treatment sector, with a special focus on understanding how they addressed the key elements for assessing resilience, such as stressors, system properties, metrics and interventions to increase resilience. The results showed that only 17 peer-reviewed papers and 6 relevant reports, a small subset of the work in wastewater research, directly addressed resilience. The lack of consensus in the definition of resilience, and the elements of a resilience assessment, is hindering the implementation of resilience in wastewater management. To date, no framework for resilience assessment is complete, comprehensive or directly applicable to practitioners; current examples are lacking key elements (e.g. a comprehensive study of stressors, properties and metrics, examples of cases study, ability to benchmark interventions or connectivity with broader frameworks). Furthermore, resilience is seen as an additional cost or extra effort, instead of a means to overcome project uncertainty that could unlock new opportunities for investment. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据