4.7 Article

Grey forecasting method of quarterly hydropower production in China based on a data grouping approach

期刊

APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING
卷 51, 期 -, 页码 302-316

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2017.07.003

关键词

Hydropower production; Grey prediction; Seasonal fluctuation; Data grouping approach

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71571157]
  2. Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China [2016M590527]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Grey model GM (1,1) has been widely used in short-term prediction of energy production and consumption due to its advantages in data sets with small numbers of samples. However, the existing GM (1,1) modelling method can merely forecast the general trend of a time series but fails to identify and predicts the seasonal fluctuations. In the research, the authors propose a data grouping approach based grey modelling method DGGM (1,1) to predict quarterly hydropower production in China. Firstly, the proposed method is used to divide an entire quarterly time series into four groups, each of which contains only time series data within the same quarter. Afterwards, by using the new series of four quarters, models are established, each of which includes specific seasonal characteristics. Finally, according to the chronological order, the prediction results of four GM (1,1) models are combined into a complete quarterly time series to reflect seasonal differences. The mean absolute percent errors (MAPEs) of the test set 2011Q1-2015Q4 solved using the DGGM (1,1), traditional GM (1,1), and SARIMA models are 16.2%, 22.1%, and 22.2%, respectively; the results indicated that DGGM (1,1) has better adaptability and offers a higher prediction accuracy. It is predicted that China's hydropower production from 2016 to 2020 is supposed to maintain its seasonal growth with the third and first quarters showing the highest and lowest productions, respectively. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据