4.8 Article

Technical and environmental evaluation of an integrated scheme for the co-treatment of wastewater and domestic organic waste in small communities

期刊

WATER RESEARCH
卷 109, 期 -, 页码 173-185

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.10.057

关键词

Decentralised treatment processes; Treated effluent reuse; Environmental profile; Nutrient removal; Resource recovery; Wastewater and domestic organic waste

资金

  1. LIFE+ LIVE WASTE [LIFE 12 ENV/CY/000544]
  2. PIONEER [PCIN-2015-227]
  3. BBVA programme 2015 edition of the BBVA Foundation Grants for Researchers and Cultural Creators [2015-PO027]
  4. COST Action ES1202
  5. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitivity [JCI-2012-11898, RYC2014-14984]
  6. CRETUS [AGRUP2015/02]
  7. Galician Competitive Research Group GRC [2013-032]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A technical and environmental evaluation of an innovative scheme for the co-treatment of domestic wastewater and domestic organic waste (DOW) was undertaken by coupling an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB), a sequencing batch reactor (SBR) and a fermentation reactor. Alternative treatment configurations were evaluated with different waste collection practices as well as various schemes for nitrogen and phosphorus removal. All treatment systems fulfilled the required quality of the treated effluent in terms of chemical oxygen demand (COD) and total suspended solids (TSS) concentrations. However, only the configurations performing the short-cut nitrification/denitrification with biological phosphorus removal met the specifications for water reuse. The environmental assessment included the analysis of impacts on climate change (CC), freshwater eutrophication (FE) and marine eutrophication (ME). A functional unit (FU) of 2000 people receiving treatment services was considered. The most relevant sources of environmental impacts were associated to the concentration of dissolved methane in the UASB effluent that is emitted to the atmosphere in the SBR process (accounting for 41% of impacts in CC), electricity consumption, mainly for aeration in the SBR (representing 14% of the impacts produced in CC), and the discharge of the treated effluent in receiving waters (contributing 98% and 57% of impacts in FE and ME, respectively). The scheme of separate waste collection together with biological nitrogen removal and phosphorus uptake via nitrite was identified as the best configuration, with good treated effluent quality and environmental impacts lower than those of the other examined configurations. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据