4.4 Article

Early 68GA-PSMA PET/MRI acquisition: assessment of lesion detectability and PET metrics in patients with prostate cancer undergoing same-day late PET/CT

期刊

CLINICAL RADIOLOGY
卷 72, 期 11, 页码 944-950

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2017.06.116

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AIM: To compare lesion detectability and positron-emission tomography (PET) metric measurements between early-PET/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquisition and sameday PET/computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the institutional review board and written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Twenty-one patients underwent non-time-of-flight (TOF) PET/MRI immediately following (68)GA-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) tracer injection in two steps: firstly, early prostate PET/MRI (pPET/MRI) and early whole-body (WB) PET/MRI (wbPET/MR) followed by WB TOF PET/CT (wbPET/CT). Lesion detectability was compared between wbPET/MRI and wbPET/CT while PET metric measurements were compared between pPET/MR, wbPET/MRI, and wbPET/CT. RESULTS: Sixty-one and 63 lesions were found on wbPET/MRI and wbPET/CT, respectively (K = 0.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.89-1.0) with very good correlation between PET metric measurements (r = 0.91; p = 0.001). Blande-Altman plots demonstrated a mean percentage difference between wbPET/CT with wbPET/MRI of 34.4% with 95% limits of agreement (LOA) between -39% to 107.9% for metabolic tumour volume (MTV) and a mean difference of 30% with LOA between -13.4% to 73.4% for peak standardised uptake value (SUVpeak). CONCLUSION: Early PET/MRI demonstrates very good lesion detectability agreement and correlation with PET metrics compared to same-day PET/CT. Nevertheless, LOA are far beyond the clinically acceptable range, and therefore, PET/CT and early PET/MRI metrics cannot be used interchangeably. (C) 2017 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据