4.8 Article

Tumor and Microenvironment Evolution during Immunotherapy with Nivolumab

期刊

CELL
卷 171, 期 4, 页码 934-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.09.028

关键词

-

资金

  1. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  2. Pershing Square Sohn Cancer Research Foundation
  3. PaineWebber Chair
  4. Stand Up 2 Cancer
  5. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center [5P30 CA008748-50]
  6. STARR Cancer Consortium
  7. Abraxis
  8. Amgen
  9. Bionomics
  10. EMD Serono
  11. Immune Design
  12. Immunogen
  13. Merck
  14. NantKwest
  15. OncoSec
  16. Genentech
  17. Incyte
  18. Ono
  19. Seattle Genetics
  20. AbbVie
  21. Aduro
  22. Bayer
  23. Jounce Therapeutics
  24. stock shareholder of Jounce Therapeutics
  25. Novartis
  26. GlaxoSmithKline
  27. MedImmune
  28. Castle Biosciences
  29. Polynoma
  30. Green Peptide
  31. eTheRNA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mechanisms by which immune checkpoint blockade modulates tumor evolution during therapy are unclear. We assessed genomic changes in tumors from 68 patients with advanced melanoma, who progressed on ipilimumab or were ipilimumabnaive, before and after nivolumab initiation (CA209-038 study). Tumors were analyzed by whole-exome, transcriptome, and/or T cell receptor (TCR) sequencing. In responding patients, mutation and neoantigen load were reduced from baseline, and analysis of intratumoral heterogeneity during therapy demonstrated differential clonal evolution within tumors and putative selection against neoantigenic mutations on-therapy. Transcriptome analyses before and during nivolumab therapy revealed increases in distinct immune cell subsets, activation of specific transcriptional networks, and upregulation of immune checkpoint genes that were more pronounced in patients with response. Temporal changes in intratumoral TCR repertoire revealed expansion of T cell clones in the setting of neoantigen loss. Comprehensive genomic profiling data in this study provide insight into nivolumab's mechanism of action.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据