4.7 Article

Atomistic modeling of metallic thin films by modified embedded atom method

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 422, 期 -, 页码 1139-1146

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.05.011

关键词

Aluminum; Interface; Metallic thin film; Modified embedded atom method potential; Molecular dynamics simulation

资金

  1. Croucher Foundation through the Start-up Allowance for Croucher Scholars [9500012]
  2. Research Grants Council (RGC) in Hong Kong through the General Research Fund (GRF) [11255616]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Molecular dynamics simulation is applied to investigate the deposition process of metallic thin films. Eight metals, titanium, vanadium, iron, cobalt, nickel, copper, tungsten, and gold, are chosen to be deposited on the aluminum substrate. The second nearest-neighbor modified embedded atom method potential is adopted to predict their thermal and mechanical properties. When quantifying the screening parameters of the potential, the error for Young's modulus and coefficient of thermal expansion between the simulated results and the experimental measurements is less than 15%, demonstrating the reliability of the potential to predict metallic behaviors related to thermal and mechanical properties. A set of potential parameters which governs the interactions between aluminum and other metals in a binary system is also generated from ab initio calculation. The details of interfacial structures between the chosen films and substrate are successfully simulated with the help of these parameters. Our results indicate that the preferred orientation of film growth depends on the film crystal structure, and the inter-diffusion at the interface is correlated the cohesive energy parameter of potential for the binary system. Such finding provides an important basis to further understand the interfacial science, which contributes to the improvement of the mechanical properties, reliability and durability of films. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据