4.6 Article

Determination of Elemental Sulfur in the Presence of Anaerobic Sediments by Extraction Procedure Using High-Performance Liquid Chromatography

期刊

WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION
卷 228, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11270-017-3358-9

关键词

High-performance liquid chromatography; Analysis; Elemental sulfur; Anaerobic sediments

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [41130206, 41202021]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [JZ2014HGQC0139]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Elemental sulfur is the most commonly found form of sulfur in anaerobic sediments. Accurate determination of elemental sulfur is the key step to know physical chemistry and biogeochemical processes in the sediments. A novel method was developed for the analysis of elemental sulfur using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with a C18 column. The procedure of determination of elemental sulfur concentrations from 0.1 to 100 mg/g (on a basis of the dry weight of sediment) is based on the direct injection of acetone extracts of sediments into a chromatographic column. The linearity range of 20-110mg/L showed an excellent linearity of response (r = 0.999). The limit of detection and limit of quantitation for elemental sulfur were 9.41 and 4.18 mu g/L, and converted sulfur mass per sediment mass was 1.88 x 10(-2) and 8.36 x 10(-3) mu g/kg. Besides, a repetitive experiment (ten times) was carried out and the average chromatographic peak area was 141.47 mg L-1. The sulfur concentration in the solution used for the determination of standard deviation and relative standard deviation was 1.02 and 0.727%, respectively. The average recovery ranges between 98 and 100%. The quantitation of elemental sulfur in sediment samples from anaerobic digestion reactor is obvious, and the average concentration of elemental sulfur on the basis of the dry weight of the sediment is 5.24 mg/g. The method was sensitive and exhibited good signal-to-noise ratio, as wyell as linear responses over a wide concentration range.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据