4.7 Article

Stationarity test and Bayesian monitoring strategy for fault detection in nonlinear multimode processes

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2017.07.010

关键词

Stationarity test; Subspace decomposition; Cross-mode analysis; DLPP; Nonlinear multimode process

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61422306, 61433005]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Industrial Control Technology, Zhejiang University, China [ICT170326]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Both of multimode and nonlinear characteristics have been common in modern industrial processes. In the present work, an improved monitoring strategy on the basis of a modified discriminant locality preserving projections (DLPP) algorithm and stationary test is proposed for nonlinear multimode process monitoring to analyze both within-mode and cross-mode information. First, the adjoined multiple local models are constructed in high dimensional kernel space to extract within-mode information through kernel fuzzy c-means algorithm and kernel principal components. Afterwards, the weighted local representations are defined by integrating the local latent vectors within each mode and the corresponding posterior probabilities of data samples. Then, a modified DLPP algorithm is developed to preserve the local structure within each mode and separate different modes as far as possible by merging local models into a low-dimensional coordinated space. Augmented Dickey Fuller test (ADF test) strategy is utilized to decompose the final low-dimensional space into two subspaces including mode-specific subspace and mode-common subspace by checking the stability of the final global data. A Bayesian monitoring strategy is presented in mode-specific subspace and residual subspace to provide more reliable monitoring results. Finally, to illustrate the feasibility and effectiveness, the proposed algorithm is illustrated with multimode data generated from the Tennessee Eastman (TE) benchmark process and Three-phase flow process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据