4.4 Article

Selective Targeting by a Mechanism-Based Inactivator against Pyridoxal 5′-Phosphate-Dependent Enzymes: MechanismS of Inactivation and Alternative Turnover

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 56, 期 37, 页码 4951-4961

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.7b00499

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 DA030604, R01 AT009143, 1R15GM113229-01]
  2. Loyola University Chicago
  3. Arthur J. Schmitt Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Potent mechanism-based inactivators can be rationally designed against pyridoxal S'-phosphate (PLP)-dependent drug targets, such as ornithine aminotransferase (OAT) or gamma-amino-butyric acid aminotransferase (GABA-AT). An important challenge, however, is the lack of selectivity toward other PLP-dependent, off: target enzymes, because of similarities in mechanisms of all PLP-dependent aminotransferase reactions. On the basis of complex crystal structures, we investigate the inactivation mechanism of OAT, a hepatocellular carcinoma target, by (1R,3S,4S)-3-amino-4fluorocyclopentane-1-carboxylic acid (FCP), a known inactivator of GABA-AT. A crystal structure of OAT and FCP showed the formation of a ternary adduct. This adduct can be rationalized as occurring via an enamine mechanism of inactivation, similar to that reported for GABA-AT. However, the crystal structure of an off target, PLP-dependent enzyme, aspartate aminotransferase (Asp-AT), in complex with FCP, along with the results of attempted inhibition assays, suggests that FCP is not an inactivator of Asp-AT, but rather an alternate substrate. Turnover of FCP by Asp AT is also supported by high-resolution mass spectrometry. Amid existing difficulties in achieving selectivity of inactivation among a large number of PLP-dependent enzymes, the obtained results provide evidence that a desirable selectivity could be achieved, taking advantage of subtle structural and mechanistic differences between a drug-target enzyme and an off target enzyme, despite their largely similar substrate binding sites and catalytic mechanisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据