4.8 Article

Electrostatic Self-Assembly of Sandwich-Like CoAI-LDH/Polypyrrole/Graphene Nanocomposites with Enhanced Capacitive Performance

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 9, 期 37, 页码 31699-31709

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b04792

关键词

electrostatic self-assembly; LDH; polypyrrole; graphene; supercapacitor

资金

  1. Taishan Scholar Foundation [tsqn20161017, ts20130929]
  2. Distinguished Young Scientist Foundation of Shandong Province [JQ201215]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21476264]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [15CX05029A, 15CX08009A, 16CX06025A]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel sandwich-like composite with ultrathin CoAl-layered double hydroxide (LDH) nanoplates electrostatically assembled on both sides of two-dimensional polypyrrole/graphene (PG) substrate has been successfully fabricated using facile hydrothermal techniques. The PG not only serves as an excellent conductive and structural scaffold to enhance the transmission of electrons and prevent aggregation of CoAl-LDH nanoplates but also contributes to the enhancement of the specific capacitance. Owing to the homogeneous dispersion of CoAl-LDH nanoplates and its intimate interaction with PG substrate, the resulting CoAl-LDH/PG nanocomposite material exhibits excellent capacitive performance, for example, enhanced gravimetric specific capacitance (864 F g(-1) at 1 A g(-1)), high rate performance (75% retention at 20 A and excellent cycle life (almost no degradation in supercapacitor performance after 5000 cycles) in aqueous KOH solution. Furthermore, the assembled asymmetric capacitor is able to deliver a superhigh energy density of 46.8 Wh kg(-1) at 1.2 kW kg(-1) and maintain 90.1% of its initial capacitance after 10 000 cycles. These results indicate a rational assembly strategy toward a high-performance pseudocapacitive electrode material with excellent rate performance, high specific capacitance, and outstanding cycle stability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据