4.4 Article

Presepsin in the prognosis of infectious diseases and diagnosis of infectious disseminated intravascular coagulation A prospective, multicentre, observational study

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY
卷 32, 期 3, 页码 199-206

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000178

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND Few prospective studies have described the prognostic accuracy of presepsin for 28-day mortality during days 0 to 7, or its role in the diagnosis of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) in patients with infection. OBJECTIVE We aimed to evaluate the clinical usefulness of presepsin levels by comparing infection markers such as procalcitonin, interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein, as well as markers of DIC such as fibrin degradation products (FDPs) and D-dimer, from days 0 to 7. DESIGN A prospective, multicentre, observational study. SETTING Four medical institutions between June 2010 and June 2011. PATIENTS A total of 191 patients who fulfilled at least one of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria were enrolled in the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The presepsin levels were evaluated for their diagnostic accuracy in discriminating between SIRS and sepsis, the prognostic accuracy for 28-day mortality from days 0 to 7 and the diagnostic accuracy for DIC in patients with infection by comparison with other infection markers. RESULTS The diagnostic accuracy for discriminating between SIRS and sepsis from combining the presepsin and procalcitonin measurements [area under the curve (AUC), 0.91; likelihood ratio, 4.96] was higher than that of presepsin (AUC, 0.89; likelihood ratio, 4.75) or procalcitonin (AUC, 0.85; likelihood ratio, 3.18) alone. Not only the correlation coefficient between the presepsin level and the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score but also the prognostic accuracy of presepsin for 28-day mortality increased with the elapsed time, and both were highest at day 7. The diagnostic accuracy for DIC generated by combining presepsin and FDP (AUC, 0.84; likelihood ratio, 3.57) was higher than that of FDP (AUC, 0.82; likelihood ratio, 2.64) or presepsin (AUC, 0.80; likelihood ratio, 2.94) alone. CONCLUSION The prognosis and severity of infection may be assessed more accurately by measuring the presepsin levels until day 7. Presepsin is a useful diagnostic tool for DIC with infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据