4.5 Article

Molecular dynamics simulation of the effects of affinity of functional groups and particle-size on the behavior of a graphene sheet in nanofluid

期刊

COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS SCIENCE
卷 139, 期 -, 页码 202-208

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2017.07.031

关键词

Nanofluid; Molecular dynamics simulation; Graphene sheet; Functional group; Dispersion

资金

  1. Technology Innovation Program - Ministry of Trade, industry & Energy (MI, Korea) [10053631]
  2. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [10053631] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The practical application of thermally enhanced nanofluids in automotive industries for higher energy efficiency requires that nanoparticles be buoyant, leading to Brownian motion in the base fluid without aggregation. Numerous studies have reported the long-term stability of dispersions resulting from steric hindrance and an affinity for the surrounding base fluid via modification of nanoparticles with functional groups. In this study, we performed molecular dynamics simulations of nanofluids containing a single graphene sheet with various functional groups to investigate the influence of affinity, as well as particle-size, on the behavior of the graphene sheet. Using the concept of the speed of nanoparticle, we quantitatively evaluated the dependence of behavior on affinity to investigate whether having more functional groups with more attractive interactions has an impact on the stable dispersion in nanofluid. In addition, the simulation results for the particle-size effect revealed that the larger nanoparticles produced more stable dispersion in nanofluid. We concluded that the behavior of the graphene sheet depends on a combination of two factors: different charge assigned to atoms due to a nitrogen atom, and the difference in mass, which influences the speed of the nanoparticles. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据