4.3 Article

Reducing Disparities in Cancer Screening and Prevention through Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships with Local Libraries: A Comprehensive Dynamic Trial

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY
卷 60, 期 1-2, 页码 145-159

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajcp.12161

关键词

Community-based participatory research; Comprehensive dynamic trial; Cancer screening; Diversity; Sustainability; Event-history analysis; Interactive systems framework

资金

  1. Cancer Action Councils
  2. National Cancer Institute [R01 CA119991-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reduction of cancer-related disparities requires strategies that link medically underserved communities to preventive care. In this community-based participatory research project, a public library system brought together stakeholders to plan and undertake programs to address cancer screening and risk behavior. This study was implemented over 48months in 20 large urban neighborhoods, selected to reach diverse communities disconnected from care. In each neighborhood, Cancer Action Councils were organized to conduct a comprehensive dynamic trial, an iterative process of program planning, implementation and evaluation. This process was phasedinto neighborhoods in random, stepped-wedge sequence. Population-level outcomes included self-reported screeningadherence and smoking cessation, based on street intercept interviews. Event-history regressions (n=9374) demonstrated that adherence outcomes were associated with program implementation, as were mediators such as awareness of screening programs and cancer information seeking. Findings varied by ethnicity, and were strongest among respondents born outside the U.S. or least engaged in care. This intervention impacted healthbehavior in diverse, underserved and vulnerable neighborhoods. It has been sustained as a routine library system program for several years after conclusion of grant support. In sum, participatory research with the public library system offers a flexible, scalable approach to reduce cancer health disparities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据