4.5 Review

An acceptor analogue of β-1,4-galactosyltransferase: Substrate, inhibitor, or both?

期刊

CARBOHYDRATE RESEARCH
卷 450, 期 -, 页码 54-59

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carres.2017.08.012

关键词

Glycosyltransferase; Acceptor; Inhibitor; Substrate

资金

  1. King's College London
  2. BBSRC IBCarb Network [IBCarbPoC-0616-040]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many glycosyltransferase inhibitors in the literature are structurally derived from the donor or acceptor substrate of the respective enzyme. A representative example is 2-naphthyl b-D-GlcNAc, a synthetic GlcNAc glycoside that has been reported as a galactosyltransferase inhibitor. This GlcNAc derivative is attractive as a chemical tool compound for biological and biochemical studies because of its reported potency as an inhibitor, and its short and straightforward synthesis from readily available starting materials. We report that in our hands, 2-naphthyl b-D-GlcNAc behaved, unexpectedly, as an acceptor substrate of the inverting b-1,4-galactosyltransferase (b-1,4-GalT) from bovine milk. This substrate activity has not previously been described. We found that 2-naphthyl b-D-GlcNAc can be an acceptor substrate both for recombinantly expressed b-1,4-GalT, and for a commercial batch of the same enzyme, and both in the presence and absence of bovine serum albumin (BSA). As expected for a full acceptor substrate, this substrate activity was time-and concentration-dependent. Additional experiments show that the observed inhibitor/substrate switch is facilitated by a phosphatase that is an essential component of our enzyme-coupled glycosyltransferase assay. These findings suggest that the behaviour of 2naphthyl b-D-GlcNAc and related acceptor-based glycosyltransferase inhibitors is strongly dependent on the individual assay conditions. Our results therefore have important implications for the use of 2naphthyl b-D-GlcNAc and related glycosides as tool compounds in glycobiology and glycobiochemistry. (C)2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据