4.6 Article

Measurement-dependent corrections to work distributions arising from quantum coherences

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW A
卷 96, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.96.052115

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Union under REA [630925-COHEAT]
  2. MIUR-FIRB-Project Coca [RBFR1379UX]
  3. EPSRC
  4. EPSRC [EP/M009165/1]
  5. Royal Society
  6. COST network [MP1209]
  7. EPSRC [EP/M009165/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/M009165/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For a quantum system undergoing a unitary, process work is commonly defined based on the two projective measurement protocols, which measures the energies of the system before and after the process. However, it is well known that projective measurements disregard quantum coherences of the system with respect to the energy basis, thus removing potential quantum signatures in the work distribution. Here we consider weak measurements of the system's energy difference and establish corrections to work averages arising from initial system coherences. We discuss two weak measurement protocols that couple the system to a detector, prepared and measured either in the momentum or the position eigenstates. Work averages are derived for when the system starts in the proper thermal state versus when the initial system state is a pure state with thermal diagonal elements and coherences characterized by a set of phases. We show that by controlling only the phase differences between the energy eigenstate contributions in the system's initial pure state, the average work done during the same unitary process can be controlled. By changing the phases alone, one can toggle from regimes where the system absorbs energy, i.e., a work cost, to the ones where it emits energy, i.e., work can be drawn. This suggests that the coherences are additional resources that can be used to manipulate or store energy in a quantum system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据