4.7 Review

Review on methodology for determining forward osmosis (FO) membrane characteristics: Water permeability (A), solute permeability (B), and structural parameter (S)

期刊

DESALINATION
卷 422, 期 -, 页码 5-16

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2017.08.006

关键词

Forward osmosis (FO); FO membrane performance parameters; Water permeability (A); Solute permeability (B); Structural parameter (S)

资金

  1. Fundamental R & D Program for Technology of World Premier Materials - Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, Republic of Korea [10037794]
  2. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [10037794] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Forward osmosis (FO) has attracted growing interest in both academic research and industrial development due to its fundamental and technical advantages. One of the key challenges that needs to be addressed to further advance this technology is the identification of an ideal membrane. However, the reliable methodology for characterizing FO membrane performance parameters has not yet been standardized, and thus various methods have been utilized to evaluate FO membrane performance. The RO-FO based method is the most widely used protocol, but it has fundamental problems in the measurement of intrinsic parameters. Non-pressurized methods have newly been suggested as another approach to evaluate FO membranes but they also have shown certain limitations, such as inaccurate performance prediction of pressure-applied FO processes. The development of a standard and reliable characterization method for FO membranes is an important step to enable the standardization of the results from different research works and to facilitate data exchange and interpretation. Process optimized standardization method, which can accurately measure the intrinsic characteristics of the different osmosis processes, thus should be investigated in more detail through further research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据