4.7 Review

Mechanisms underlying degradation pathways of microcystin-LR with doped TiO2 photocatalysis

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 330, 期 -, 页码 355-371

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.07.161

关键词

Titanium dioxide; Microcystin-LR; Water treatment; Photodegradation; Intermediates

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51608208]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M610513]
  3. Research Foundation of Education Department of Hunan Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The presence of cyanotoxins in different water sources, originating from cyanobacterial algal blooms, is a ubiquitous, global concern. Microcystins (MCs) are the most commonly occurring class of cyanbacterial toxin, and are characterized as cyclic heptapeptides containing five D-amino acids and two variable L-amino acids. Over 100 MC variants exist, and microcystin-LR (MC-LR) is one of the most hazardous and prevalent. Removing MC-LR from aqueous solutions by titanium dioxide (TiO2) photocatalysis has been proposed as a possible solution for this. Both metal and non-metal doped TiO2 photocatalysts have been investigated over recent decades for their MC-LR photocatalytic degradation properties under visible light. This review provides an overview of visible light-activated TiO2 synthesis technologies, and structural and electronical properties. The photocatalytic behavior of visible light-activated TiO2 for the photodegradation of MC-LR is discussed. The structural elucidation of reaction intermediates of the degradation pathways, and the mechanisms of MC-LR degradation by visible-light activated TiO2 in comparison with conventional UV-activated TiO2, is given particular emphasis. We also aimed to identify research gaps and uncertainties that exist for the use of visible light-activated TiO2 in photocatalysis. Additional research requirements for visible light-activated TiO2 photocatalysts and potential areas for future applications of doped TiO2 photocatalysts under visible light are also proposed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据