4.4 Article

Expression of Kidney Injury Molecule-1 in Healthy and Diseased Feline Kidney Tissue

期刊

VETERINARY PATHOLOGY
卷 54, 期 3, 页码 490-510

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0300985817690213

关键词

acute kidney injury; acute renal failure; aquaporin; cat; immunohistochemistry; IRIS; proximal tubule; urinary tract; vimentin

资金

  1. Pet Trust Foundation at the University of Guelph
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sensitive markers to detect acute kidney injury (AKI) in cats are lacking. Kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) is a promising marker of acute tubular injury in humans, and sequence and structure of feline KIM-1 have been determined. KIM-1 is shed into urine of cats with natural AKI. The objectives of this study were to characterize temporal and cellular expression of KIM-1 in kidneys from cats without and with experimental and natural AKI using histopathology and immunohistochemistry. Tissue sections from 8 cats without kidney disease, 3 to 4 cats with experimentally induced AKI on each day 1, 3, 6, and 12 after unilateral ischemia/reperfusion, and 9 cats with natural AKI were assessed. In sections from cats without kidney disease, patterns of periodic acid-Schiff and aquaporin-1 staining allowed identification of 3 distinct segments of the proximal tubule. KIM-1 staining was absent in segments 1 (S1) and S2, and faint in S3. Injury of S3 in cats with experimental and natural AKI was characterized by cell loss and necrosis, and remaining intact cells had cytoplasmic blebs and reduced brush borders. In experimental AKI, intensity of KIM-1 expression increased in proportion to the severity of injury and was consistently present in S3 but only transiently in other segments. Vimentin was absent in proximal tubules of healthy cats but expressed in injured S3. These findings indicate that S3 is the proximal tubular segment most susceptible to ischemic injury and that KIM-1 is a sensitive tissue indicator of AKI in cats.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据