4.6 Article

Optimizing extraction and analysis of pharmaceuticals in human urine, struvite, food crops, soil, and lysimeter water by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

期刊

ANALYTICAL METHODS
卷 9, 期 41, 页码 5952-5962

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7ay01801k

关键词

-

资金

  1. USEPA grant [RD-83556701-1, WERF STAR_N1R14]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human urine is an abundant, renewable resource that can be used as a valuable source of fertilizer because it is rich in nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium. As fertilizers derived from urine become more widely used, it is important to understand how excreted pharmaceuticals are transported from urine to the environment. Many pharmaceuticals are excreted from the human body in their native form; therefore, when urine is used as a fertilizer, biologically active pharmaceuticals can be released into the environment. The goal of this study was to develop sensitive methods for the analysis of pharmaceuticals in urine, struvite, lysimeter water, soil, and food crops using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The ability to detect low levels of pharmaceutical residues in various environmental matrices will aid in assessing the potential risks associated with the field application of urine that is used to fertilize croplands. The optimized method reported in this paper, which utilizes solid phase extraction for sample clean-up and pre-concentration, offers analyte recoveries ranging from 29 to 112 percent, and detection limits ranging from 0.89 ng L-1 to 0.0047 mu g g(-1). The optimized extraction method provides intra-day and inter-day reproducibility of less than 10% for all analytes in all matrices investigated, with the exception for ciprofloxacin in urine. The use of isotope dilution for quantification proved necessary to compensate for matrix effects, especially in urine where matrix effects can range from about 21% to 79%. Overall, the method described here is robust and widely applicable to various types of environmental samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据