4.6 Article

Hedgehog signaling inhibitor GANT61 induces endoplasmic reticulum stress-mediated protective autophagy in hepatic stellate cells

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.08.164

关键词

Hedgehog signaling; GANT61; Hepatic stellate cells; Autophagy; ER stress

资金

  1. Medical Science and Technology Program of Zhejiang Province [2014KYA228, 2016KYA195, 2017KY714]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [Q17H120001]
  3. Scientific Research Project of Taizhou Science and Technology Bureau in Zhejiang Province [1402ky22]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hedgehog (Hh) signaling plays an important role in the viability maintenance of hepatic stellate cells (HSC). HSCs have been identified as the major profibrogenic cells in the liver. The present study revealed that a novel Hh signaling antagonist GANT61 induced apoptosis in the activated human hepatic stellate cell line LX-2 cells, as it dose-dependently caused mitochondrial inner transmembrane potential (Delta psi m) loss and caspase-3 cleavage. Autophagic flux was markedly increased after GANT61 treatment. Moreover, we found that autophagy was a pro-survival factor in GANT61-treated LX-2 cells because autophagic inhibitors 3-Methyladenine (3-MA) or Chloroquine (CQ) significantly aggravated GANT61-induced cytotoxicity. Furthermore, the endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-resident molecular chaperone BiP, a marker of ER stress, was markedly increased after incubation with GANT61. Meanwhile, the PERK-eIF2 alpha-ATF4CHOP pathway was observed to be activated by GANT61. Salubrinal, a selective inhibitor of ER stress, suppressed GANT61-induced LC3BII expression and enhanced poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) cleavage, indicating that ER stress is a trigger of autophagy and suppresses apoptosis in GANT61-treated LX-2 cells. Overall, these results demonstrate that simultaneous inhibition of Hh signaling and autophagy or ER stress could be a better way to reduce activated HSCs. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据