4.4 Article

Toxoplasma gondii seroprevalence and association with equine protozoal myeloencephalitis: A case-control study of Californian horses

期刊

VETERINARY JOURNAL
卷 224, 期 -, 页码 38-43

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2017.05.008

关键词

Equine protozoal myeloencephalitis; IFAT; Neospora hughesi; Sarcocystis neurona; Toxoplasma gondii

资金

  1. Center for Equine Health, University of California at Davis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

While toxoplasmosis is not commonly considered a clinical disease of equines, previous seroprevalence studies have reported differing background rates of Toxoplasma gondii infection in horses globally. The objective of this study was to evaluate possible associations between T gondii seroprevalence and clinical signs of equine protozoal myeloencephalitis (EPM) in horses. Using a case control study design, 720 Californian horses with neurologic signs compatible with EPM were compared to healthy, non neurologic horses for the presence of T. gondii antibodies (using indirect fluorescent antibody tests [IFAT]). Toxoplasma gondii seroprevalence among cases and controls was determined at standard serum cut-offs: 40, 80, 160, 320, and 640. At a T. gondii titre cut-off of 320, horses with clinical signs compatible with EPM had 3.55 times the odds of a seropositive test compared to those without clinical signs (P < 0.01) when adjusted for covariates. When restricted to the autumn season and at the same titre cut-off, an EPM suspect horse had 6.4 times the odds of testing seropositive to T. gondii, compared to non-neurologic horses. The association between high 7: gondii titres and clinical signs compatible with EPM is potentially reflective of toxoplasmosis in equines. Serologic testing of cerebrospinal fluid and isolation of T. gondii in EPM suspect cases should be considered. Future studies investigating the relationship between 7'. gondii and EPM are warranted. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据