4.3 Article

Surveillance of Infectious Bovine Rhinotracheitis in marker-vaccinated dairy herds: Application of a recombinant gE ELISA on bulk milk samples

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2017.01.003

关键词

IBR; gE ELISA; Bulk milk; Marker vaccination

资金

  1. University of Torino (Progetti di Ricerca Finalizzati)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Infectious Bovine Rhinotracheitis (IBR) occurs worldwide, requiring significant resources for eradication programs or surveillance purposes. The status of infection is usually detected by serological methods using the virus neutralization test (VNT) or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) on individual sera. The gE DIVA (Differentiating Infected from Vaccinated Animals) vaccines approach, adopted in order to reduce the virus circulation and prevent clinical signs, have tightened the range of available methods for the serological diagnosis. Different gE blocking ELISA could be performed to detect specific antibodies in sera of infected or whole virus-vaccinated animals but with less sensitivity if applied to bulk milk samples, especially in marker-vaccinated herds. A new rec-gE ELISA was recently developed in Italy and applied with good performances on blood serum samples. The present paper focuses on the application of a rapid protocol for purification/concentration of immunoglobulin G (IgG) from bulk milk and on the use of the new rec-gE indirect ELISA. The study involved three different partners and 225 herds (12,800 lactating cows) with different official IBR diagnostic statuses. The diagnostic specificity of the method was demonstrated closed to 100% while the diagnostic sensitivity was strictly related to the herd-seroprevalence. Considering 2.5% as the limit of detection of within-herd seropositivity prevalence, the diagnostic sensitivity showed by the proposed method was equal to 100%. A single reactivation of a whole strain vaccine in an old cow was detected inside a group of 67 lactating cows, showing the field applicability of the method. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据