4.4 Article

The Influence of Different Strategies for the Saccharification of the Banana Plant Pseudostem and the Detoxification of Concentrated Broth on Bioethanol Production

期刊

APPLIED BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 183, 期 3, 页码 943-965

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12010-017-2475-7

关键词

Biofuel; Biomass; Renewable energy; Alternative energy; Ethanol 2G

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pseudostem of the Musa cavendishii banana plant was submitted to chemical pretreatments with acid (H2SO4 2%, 120 A degrees C, 15 min) and with alkali (NaOH 3%, 120 A degrees C, 15 min), saccharified by commercial enzymes NovozymesA (R) (Cellic CTec2 and HTec2). The influences of the pretreatments on the degradation of the lignin, cellulose and hemicellulose, porosity of the surface, particle crystallinity, and yield in reducing sugars after saccharification (Y (RS)), were established. Different concentrations of biomass (70 and 100 g/L in dry matter (dm)), with different physical differences (dry granulated, crushed wet bagasse, and whole pseudostem), were used. The broth with the highest Y (RS) among the different strategies tested was evaporated until the concentration of reducing sugars (RS) was to the order of 100 g/L and fermented, with and without prior detoxification with active carbon. Fermentation was carried out in Erlenmeyer flasks, at 30 A degrees C, initial pH 5.0, and 120 rpm. In comparison to the biomass without chemical pretreatment and to the biomass pretreated with NaOH, the acid pretreatment of 70 g/L of dry granulated biomass enabled greater digestion of hemicellulose, lower index of cellulose crystallinity, and higher Y (RS) (45.8 +/- 0.7%). The RS increase in fermentation broth to 100 g/L, with posterior detoxification, presented higher productivity ethanol (Q (P) = 1.44 +/- 0.02 g/L/h) with ethanol yield (Y (P/RS)) of 0.41 +/- 0.02 g/g. The value of Q (P) was to the order of 75% higher than Q (P) obtained with the same broth without prior detoxification.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据