4.4 Article

Pregnancy in women with nonclassic congenital adrenal hyperplasia: Time to conceive and outcome

期刊

CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 87, 期 5, 页码 552-556

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cen.13429

关键词

congenital adrenal hyperplasia; fertility; nonclassic 21-hydroxylase deficiency; pregnancy outcome

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Nonclassic congenital adrenal hyperplasia (NCAH) is common among Ashkenazi Jews (1:400). It is associated with various degrees of postnatal virilization, irregular menses and infertility. Therapy of symptomatic subjects consists of physiologic doses of glucocorticoids. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of glucocorticoid treatment on fertility and on pregnancy outcome in women with NCAH. Design, Setting and Patients: This retrospective study included 75 women diagnosed with NCAH who were followed in our clinic and sought fertility between 2008 and 2015. Results: Seventy-two women succeeded in conceiving (187 pregnancies). Time to conception was 4.0 +/- 7 months without and 3.3 +/- 3 months with glucocorticoid therapy (P =.43). Seventeen pregnancies were achieved by glucocorticoid therapy after failure to conceive spontaneously. Time to conception before therapy initiation was 10.2 +/- 11.4 months compared to 3.3 +/- 3.4 months after therapy initiation (P =.02). Of 187 pregnancies, 135 (72%) resulted in live births, 38 (20.3%) ended in spontaneous miscarriages during the first trimester, seven (3.7%) were electively terminated, three (1.6%) were ectopic and four (2.1%) were ongoing during the study with similar rate in glucocorticoid treated and untreated pregnancies. Conclusions: The 96% pregnancy rate among our cohort of NCAH females was similar to the 95% rate reported for the normal population. Glucocorticoid therapy may shorten the time to conceive in a subgroup of women with NCAH. Glucocorticoid therapy did not affect the rate of first trimester miscarriage. Our 77% live birth rate was similar to the 72% live birth rate in the current healthy US population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据