4.7 Article

SCooP: an accurate and fast predictor of protein stability curves as a function of temperature

期刊

BIOINFORMATICS
卷 33, 期 21, 页码 3415-3422

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx417

关键词

-

资金

  1. Belgian Fund for Scientific Research (FNRS) [T.0100.16]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Motivation: The molecular bases of protein stability remain far from elucidated even though substantial progress has been made through both computational and experimental investigations. One of the most challenging goals is the development of accurate prediction tools of the temperature dependence of the standard folding free energy DG(T). Such predictors have an enormous series of potential applications, which range from drug design in the biopharmaceutical sector to the optimization of enzyme activity for biofuel production. There is thus an important demand for novel, reliable and fast predictors. Results: We present the SCooP algorithm, which is a significant step towards accurate temperature-dependent stability prediction. This automated tool uses the protein structure and the host organism as sole entries and predicts the full T-dependent stability curve of monomeric proteins assumed to follow a two-state folding transition. Equivalently, it predicts all the thermodynamic quantities associated to the folding transition, namely the melting temperature Tm, the standard folding enthalpy DHm measured at Tm, and the standard folding heat capacity DCp. The cross-validated performances are good, with correlation coefficients between predicted and experimental values equal to [0.80, 0.83, 0.72] for DHm, DCp and Tm, respectively, which increase up to [0.88, 0.90, 0.78] upon the removal of 10% outliers. Moreover, the stability curve prediction of a target protein is very fast: it takes less than a minute. SCooP can thus potentially be applied on a structurome scale. This opens new perspectives of large-scale analyses of protein stability, which is of considerable interest for protein engineering.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据