4.7 Article

QTL mapping and candidate gene analysis of ferrous iron and zinc toxicity tolerance at seedling stage in rice by genome-wide association study

期刊

BMC GENOMICS
卷 18, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-017-4221-5

关键词

Rice; Fe toxicity; Zn toxicity; GWAS; QTL

资金

  1. Chinese Ministry of Agriculture [2016-X16]
  2. CAAS
  3. Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology [2014AA10A601]
  4. Shenzhen Peacock Plan [20,130,415,095,710,361]
  5. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1130530]
  6. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1130530] Funding Source: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Ferrous iron (Fe) and zinc (Zn) at high concentration in the soil cause heavy metal toxicity and greatly affect rice yield and quality. To improve rice production, understanding the genetic and molecular resistance mechanisms to excess Fe and Zn in rice is essential. Genome-wide association study (GWAS) is an effective way to identify loci and favorable alleles governing Fe and Zn toxicty as well as dissect the genetic relationship between them in a genetically diverse population. Results: A total of 29 and 31 putative QTL affecting shoot height (SH), root length (RL), shoot fresh weight (SFW), shoot dry weight (SDW), root dry weight (RDW), shoot water content (SWC) and shoot ion concentrations (SFe or SZn) were identified at seedling stage in Fe and Zn experiments, respectively. Five toxicity tolerance QTL (qSdw3a, qSdw3b, qSdw12 and qSFe5 / qSZn5) were detected in the same genomic regions under the two stress conditions and 22 candidate genes for 10 important QTL regions were also determined by haplotype analyses. Conclusion: Rice plants share partial genetic overlaps of Fe and Zn toxicity tolerance at seedling stage. Candidate genes putatively affecting Fe and Zn toxicity tolerance identified in this study provide valuable information for future functional characterization and improvement of rice tolerance to Fe and Zn toxicity by marker-assisted selection or designed QTL pyramiding.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据